What Is the Mind?

Healing and Wellness, The Mind

The Mind Defined

Is there a more confusing term as the mind? Probably not, so let’s dive in. The mainstream scientific community defines the mind as a set of mental states and functional processes (thoughts, perceptions, feelings) — a byproduct of the brain. The Law of One (78:11) refers to the mind as the mind complexreflecting the inpourings of the spirit complex and the up-pourings of the body complex (30:2). It’s considered the mirror that allows the two complexes to communicate. The Law of One further explains that the mind also contains our feelings, thoughts, and dreams. Powered by life force energy (prana), the mind also filters and interprets consciousness (Law of One, 30:2).

In spiritual and esoteric communities the mind is generally referred to as the subtle, material instrument that receives impulses from our senses and processes them into thoughts and actions. Where it’s located is debatable. According to Swami Mukundananda (Bhakti Yog Saint & Yoga Teacher), one’s physical brain resides in the head, but the subtle mind resides in the heart region (Bhagavad Gita, 4:42). We tend to resonate with the concept that the mind is part of the subtle astral body. Could it also be considered part of the field of activities explained in the Bhagavad Gita (13:6)? 

Perhaps an easier way to think about it is that the mind acts as a bridge between the soul and material body. It’s how we experience thoughts, intuition, memories, emotions, feelings, and sensations, as mentioned by Bernard Carr, PhD (Cosmologist). To avoid confusion, we’re using the term mind to refer to the subtle shuttle that consists of our senses, feelings, ego identity, memory, intellect, and intelligence. Being part of the subtle astral body, perhaps the mind not only uses the energy processed by the energy centers (chakras), but it also directs and stabilizes the energy flow of our energy centers and energy fields (auras).

Consider this fellow souls. What if the quality of the mind (purified versus confused) dictates the health and function of our energy centers? Ergo, the subtle astral body (specifically the etheric body) could be considered the energetic blueprint of the physical gross body; energy centers (chakras) would be considered transformers; the mind would be considered the operator; and the physical gross body would be considered the result. Simply put, without the mind, we’d have no way to use our bodies to learn lessons.

Elements of the Mind

Subtle Instruments

The mind is not considered a single unit but a complex hierarchy of subtle instruments. The senses, through which the mind interacts with the world, is often divided into two groups of five. The working senses are the action senses. The mind uses them to express its will and perform work. They are speech (vak), hands (pani), legs (pada), genitals (upashtam), and the anus (payu). The knowledge senses are the five senses used to gather information and perceive the environment. They are touch or skin (tvak), taste or tongue (jivha), smell or nose (grahna), hearing or ears (shotra), and sight or eyes (chakshu).

The inner instruments of the mind often consist of four functional parts, according to the Bhagavad Gita (3:42) and Carl Gustav Jung (Psychologist, 1875 – 1961). They are the sensory mind (mana), intellect (buddhi), ego or conscious mind (ahankarah), and subconscious memory or personal unconscious (chitta).

  • The sensory mind (mana) receives signals from the senses and filters them to our higher faculties. It acts a gatekeeper to determine our immediate responses or emotions.
  • The intellect (buddhi) is considered our higher faculty of decision-making, discernment, and wisdom. It’s considered superior to the sensory mind because it analyzes, interprets, and categorizes raw sensory data and emotions. The intellect determines what all of the data means, our feelings, and how to act based on our subconscious memory.
  • The ego (ahankarah) is said to create the sense of individual identity and ownership over the material body (Bhagavad Gita, 13:30). This is consistent with Carl Jung’s interpretation of the conscious mind.
  • The subconscious memory (chitta) is considered the storehouse of mental/karmic impressions (samskaras) and past memories that influence our current reactions. This is consistent with Carl Jung’s interpretation of the personal unconscious which contains memories, including those that have been suppressed.

The Mind In Daily Life

How does all this apply to daily life? In daily life, the working senses perform an action based on a like or dislike (desire or aversion). Those likes or dislikes are usually triggered by raw data brought in by the knowledge senses. The sensory mind will then provide instant, reactive emotions while the intellect is supposed to step in and decide if the action is beneficial. It’s like the sensory mind will make us instantly aware of a loud noise, while the intellect will analyze whether that noise represents a danger, prompting us to act accordingly. But sometimes the ego will hijack the intellect to claim the experience (“I did this”) making us identify with the material body rather than as the observer (eternal soul). Pesky egos.

Let’s think of this in the form of an analogy. Think of our sensory mind as the Google app. It provides the interface that delivers app notifications (feelings) and search results (emotions). Samskaras are the predictive algorithm and cached search history. They pre-determine our auto-fill responses (reactions) and search results. The intellect is the app admin, which prioritizes notifications and helps determines how we should respond to the notifications and results. Mindfulness is like incognito mode. It provides the clarity to observe the data (raw sensory data) without letting the algorithm (samskaras) automatically dictate our content (behaviors).

The Mind, Brain & Consciousness

The Brain’s Dependency on Consciousness

Talk about a question for the ages: does the brain create consciousness (and the mind)? Or, hear us out, does the brain simply filter, channel, or display consciousness (and the mind)? Spiritual and esoteric communities seem to agree that the brain is simply hardware. It acts more like a switchboard allowing the mind to interact with planes/realms of existence. 

Consider this fellow souls. Consciousness contains all of the information of the universe simultaneously. Carl Gustav Jung (Psychologist, 1875 – 1961) refers to this collection of patterns and information as the collective unconscious or objective psyche. This collection of shared psychological patterns and information is said to be common to all human beings or cultures, perhaps genetically inherited. It isn’t learned or shaped by our personal experiences. Imagine how difficult it would be for us to survive in this world with such a high volume of information coursing through us every second. What if the brain puts a VR headset on us cutting off 99% of this information? When we meditate, the flow of consciousness can finally break through that barrier. 

This suggests that the brain is dependent on consciousness and the mind to function, meaning consciousness exists before and after the brain. There does seem to be evidence of this, specifically through near-death-experiences (NDEs) and out-of-body experiences (OBEs). During an NDE, the brain often shows zero electrical activity (flat EEG). Yet, most patients report the most vivid, lucid, and structured consciousness of their lives.

The mainstream scientific community still seems to assert that the mind and consciousness are byproducts of the brain, maintaining a materialistic point of view. Specifically, they believe consciousness is an emergent property of complex neural firing. To them, when the neurons stop firing, the light of the mind simply goes out. But, think about that for a second. If this were true, a dying brain should produce static, not hyper-clear experiences like with NDEs. Even the best materialist scientists admit they have no clue how chemical signals in the brain turn into the feelings of seeing colors or being in love. This is famously known as the hard problem of consciousness, coined by David Chalmers (Philosopher).

The Brain As a Prediction Processor

There are those in the mainstream scientific community who are starting to challenge the idea that the brain creates consciousness, as mentioned on Disclosure (S3:E1-3) with Rupert Sheldrake (Biologist & Parapsychology Researcher). Consider this fellow souls. Could the brain be a prediction/perception processor — meaning we predict our world into existence as controlled hallucinations or simulations, as mentioned by Anil Seth (Neuroscientist)? This is synonymous with Aditya Prasad’s (Software Engineer) suggestion that all matter is a cognitive hallucination, even the brain. It’s also consistent with Karl Friston’s (Neuroscientist) work, which suggests that our brain doesn’t passively receive sensory data

Karl Friston suggests that the brain actively predicts what we see based on past patterns, then checks incoming data against predictions. This suggests that most of what we see is actually prediction rather than direct observation. Could optical illusions prove this? This is consistent with our esoteric resources which explain that past experiences create mental formations or karmic impressions (samskaras) that condition our future perception. These templates sit in our mind waiting for new sensory data to come in. Then our intellect matches it against our existing templates creating a closed loop cycle — an echo chamber of reinforced beliefs that feel like our destiny. This would suggest that we perceive the world through increasingly narrow filters. 

By this logic, we’ve never actually seen this material reality because every single thing we’ve perceived has been a construct of our minds. Or perhaps only newborns experiencing their very first incarnation — with no memories or samskaras — are the only ones who’ve truly perceived this material reality. 

FEATURE

MAINSTREAM SCIENCE VIEW

SPIRITUAL VIEW

The Brain

The generator of the mind

The receiver of the mind

Consciousness

A byproduct of biology

The fundamental fabric of reality

NDEs /OBEs

Hallucinations from a dying brain

Evidence of the soul leaving the antenna

Death

The end of the self

A change in vibrational frequency, or consciousness level, or material form

Operational States of the Mind

Swami Mukundananda (Bhakti Yog Saint & Yoga Teacher) explains that the mind operates at four levels (antahkarana) (Bhagavad Gita: 6:5, 18:57). The gist is that when it receives sensory input and creates thoughts, we call it mana. We call it buddhi or intellect when it analyses, discerns, and decides. When the mind gets attached to an object or person, we call it chitta — the subconscious/memory storing samskaras. When it becomes identified with the body and pride, we call it ahankarah or ego — the sense of I-ness that claims ownership over the body and thoughts.

The mind can also be categorized into states (avasthas). According to Swami Sarvapriyananda’s (Monk & Spiritual Leader) explanation from the Mandukya Upanishad, these states are waking, dreaming, and deep sleeping. The turiya state underlies the other three.

Waking (jagrat) is awareness turned outward, where we mistake the material universe as the ultimate reality through our senses and body. Dreaming (swapna) is awareness turned inward, where we’re caught in the ignorance of the dream’s reality. Deep sleeping (sushupti) is awareness withdrawn. It’s where there are no dreams or desire. There is…drum roll please…pure ignorance because we’re not consciously aware of the real self — like a computer in hibernation. 

Turiya is considered pure consciousness and the real self (atman) that witnesses the other three states. It’s suggested that the former two states are more susceptible to ignorance and error, whereas the deep sleeping state is more susceptible to ignorance.

Sensory Mind Versus Intellect

Which is superior, the intellect or the sensory mind? Swami Mukundananda (Bhakti Yog Saint & Yoga Teacher) is team intellect, affirming that the intellect is superior to the sensory mind. This is because we develop desires based on the knowledge of the intellect (Bhagavad Gita, 2:41). Think of it like this. The senses are superior to the body; the sensory mind is superior to the senses; the intellect is superior to the sensory mind; and the soul is superior to the intellect (Bhagavad Gita: 2:68 , 3:42).

Does this mean our intellect essentially controls our mind? Here’s an example. Resolute intellect can cultivate single-minded focus and provide direction. So if our intellect is strong and aligned with absolute truth, it can command us to focus. But if our intellect is weak or uneducated, the mind typically takes over and follows the senses. Pesky weak intellect.

The Law of One (74:11, 75:23, 80:10) speaks of the adept or the disciplined personality. Fascinating concept, but a bit next level. It suggests that for us to become effective, we need to reach a point where the mind complex is no longer constrained by thoughts, opinions, or environmental catalysts. Instead, our personality should be conscious and disciplined enough to choose our responses based on our chosen polarity or disposition — service to others (STO) or service to self (STS). The disciplined personality and resolute intellect are essentially the same concept — cultivating a spiritual director within the self.

To further describe these relationships, Swami Mukundananda references the chariot analogy (Bhagavad Gita, 3:43) explained in the Katha Upanishad

  • Chariot (body) – physical vehicle
  • Horses (5 senses) – power and movement
  • Reins (mind) – tool used to communicate with the horses
  • Charioteer (intellect) – the one who holds the knowledge of the destination
  • Passenger (the soul) – silent observer and witness

The takeaway from this fellow souls is that spiritual progress is the process of strengthening the charioteer (intellect) so that the reins (mind) can successfully guide the horses (senses) in service to the passenger (soul).

FEATURE

VEDIC PHILOSOPHY

LAW OF ONE

The Goal

Unified Harmony with Source

Unified Harmony with the One Infinite Creator

The Faculty

Resolute intellect (buddhi) which is being one-pointed and focused on absolute truth/God

Disciplined personality which is being one-pointed and focused on the One Infinite Creator

Energy Center

Third Eye (Ajna)

Indigo Ray, the ray of willpower

Method

Using the intellect to discern between the eternal and the temporary. This prevents the mind from getting attached to temporary things that cause suffering.

Balancing emotions and accepting catalysts to keep the mind steady. Ergo, if anger is felt, find love in that anger. If fear is felt, find safety.

Result

Stability in the self

Access to intelligent infinity (pure consciousness + will)